More Pages: Northern Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97


Golf Great Britain and Ireland: A Traveler's Guide to More
An absolute must if you are planning your own UK golf trip
A must-have for golfing travel to the British isles

Ted's Excellent Hunting AdventuresRoosevelt's writing has an unfortunate tendency towards hyperbole. For example, he is incapable of simply eating a meal, instead he has a magnificent feast or a delicious repast. There is an annoying tendency to employ cute phrases that grate on a modern reader's ear. He refers to bears as "Ephraim" or "Bruin" and all large animals are "brutes" or "savage brutes." Putting aside these minor complaints this book is a fascinating historical document which contains information about the natural history of North American game species that is still useful to hunters and outdoorsmen today.
Quintessential RooseveltThe two books in this volume are highly recommended.
Excellent period piece of history

A Fine Primer on IrelandAnthony O'Neill Miller
WONDERFUL HISTORY OF IRELAND,VERY EASY TO UNDERSTANDIT IS OBJECTIVE IN ITS DEALING WITH THE MANY INTERNAL PROBLEMS
IRELAND HAD AND STILL HAS WITH ENGLAND. IT IS A WONDERFUL WAY TO UNDERSTAND BOTH THE IRISH FEELINGS ABOUT INDEPENDENCE AND THE
FEELING THE BRITISH HAVE ABOUT THIS INDEPENDENCE. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.......
Great

A woman imprisoned by the passage of time.Judith, convent-raised, unmarried, and forty-something moves into Mrs. Rice's boarding house on Camden Street. It is her sixth relocation in the last few years. We find out WHY later. She teaches piano and embroidery to an ever diminishing handful of students, has very few possessions, and fewer social attachments. In fact, her only social involvement is tea with the O'Neill family on Sunday afternoons. Only later do we find how one-sided even this relationship is. The O'Neills secretly dread her visits.
We are soon to sense the brooding cloud of narrowness, plainness, loneliness, and ignorance that hovers over this poor soul. Moore captures it. Even her physical frame, he says, is "plain as a cheap clothes rack."
To sustain herself she lives in a world of religious faith and imagination... or illusion. She daydreams, and surrounds herself with iconic totems from her uneventful past. And she has a secret vice that isn't revealed until almost midway in the novel. She's a(n) _____! (I won't say).
The novel revolves around Judith's interactions with the many other residents of Mrs. Rice's home. Because of Judith's long repressed desires and vivid imagination, she is quick to assume that Mr. Madden's attentions will lead to a splendid marriage. But in their mutually illusive worlds they are both nursing dissimilar motives as regards each other. And meanwhile, Judith is being horribly set up for a total spiritual/emotional breakdown by a certain nefarious Iago-like presence in the home. As a result of her mounting disappointments she questions (abandons?) her religious faith, and is led in increasing measure to wallow in her secret vice... the real "passion" of Judith Hearne. And it is indeed, partaken in abject loneliness. Even the Church, represented by the tactless Father Quigley, rejects her cry for help. He heaps penitence and guilt where forgiveness and grace are needed.
This novel is brilliant in its portrayal of a woman at the very outer limits of disillusionment. Trapped by the passage of time. In the end, she looks in the mirror and smiles a costly smile. It has cost her the illusion, the pretence, and the ill-founded faith of all her years.
The grim reality of Belfast boarding house bluesSurreptiously she takes long bus rides to the edge of town for whiskey-buying expeditions, and has to take the clinking bottles back up the stairs of her lonely room. She seems to have no real friends or interests, and is moving from boarding house to boarding house as her alcoholism is discovered; landlords kick her out. What is new and exciting in this parish is the older brother of the landlady just back from 30 years of living in New York, making allusions to his life in the hotel business. She finds out by accident that he was a doorman for a hotel. He'd done every job he could find in the rough streets of NYC, and thought his doorman job the best ever he'd found, until he was injured by a car hitting him, giving him one bum leg dragging. These and many other details are piled up upon the reader through various characters' gossiping with each other. For example, the 30-year-old Mama's boy, son of the landlady, is screwing the 16-year-old maid, and hangs out all day with no job, telling tale tales and spreading malicious humors to keep his own reputation clean. The ex-NYer was a very disappointed fellow who started drinking at bars, just to stay out of the house, realizing that he had no place in his old home country, neither in his small village in Donegal, nor in Belfast, so he mutters about "going down to Dublin", but never does he leave. He can live rent-free at his sister's, and she resents it o boy!
The sad decline into a drinking binge of this woman is quite a feat; one suspects the writer must have himself experienced it or known someone who'd done the same. It's peculiarly Irish, how far down she goes, in her last faint hopes for romance, crushed when the NY'er begins to ignore her when he realizes she has no money and can't be a business partner.
And so it goes... better not give away anymore of the plot.
A beautiful display of the disappointed....

If Only They Could Be Kinder To Each Other
An unparalleled reading experience.The rest of the book is dedicated to over sixty interviews. Parker briefly sets up each interview with a description of the setting, including the outward emotional appearance of the interviewee unless specifically asked to do otherwise. That small description at the beginning of each interview is the only time that we hear Parker's voice.
Parker interviewed ordinary people, children, elderly people, teachers, professors, students, political party leaders, army personnel, police, priests, clergy, people trying to make a difference, and people considered terrorists.
The main point of this book was to give a voice to the people of Belfast. The point was to provide an opportunity for people to explain how they felt and why they felt that way without being edited or judged. The effect was that each person was able to be heard exactly as they had expressed themselves.
Father Michael Brown expressed his disappointment that the church (either of them) had not taken more of leadership role to "build bridges . . . to keep the peace. . ." (p. 61). This book was perhaps the only format in which he was able to express his disappointment without being branded a traitor of sorts.
Parker interviews several people from both sides of the Troubles who are seen as terrorists by the other side. To say the least none of them sees himself or herself as being a terrorist. Here they get a chance to explain why. Marie Jones is a member of the IRA. The intelligent manner in which she spoke lent credence to her philosophies. She spoke of her first moment when she began to feel anti-British sentiment. She had been walking home alone from school when two British soldiers stopped her with rifles pointed at her head just to ask her name and address. Given this opportunity she is also able to express her dislike and distrust of the Catholic Church. This opportunity would never present itself to her in any other format. Being a member of the IRA it would naturally be assumed in most circles that she is Catholic and proud of it. Parker's theme was kept throughout the entirety of the book. With each interview the reader understands that the speaker is speaking from a place of non-judgement as they get their chance to be heard. I was convinced throughout the book that Parker went to whatever extreme was necessary to make the interviewee as at ease as possible so that they would speak honestly and openly. On many occasions this was very obvious. Nowhere was this more obvious than when he interviewed members of the Royal Ulster.
"The agreement was simple and straightforward. A completely false and misleading name, no description of appearance or manner, and no indication of where the interview took place." (p. 199)
With that agreed upon, "Max Harvey" was able to talk openly without fear of being identified by a paramilitary group.
When he interviewed members of the British Army he was just as honest with the reader about the main point of his book being compromised in that section.
"(Only after a long delay did the Army authorities agree to interviewing of (their) selected personnel: and only on the condition that it was carried out in the presence of a 'minder' who tape-recorded the tape-recorded interviewing. An undertaking had to be given that they could sensor any parts they wished to: and a further condition was that these conditions should not be mentioned.)" (p. 175)
The result of Parker's relentless quest for honest, open, and non-judgmental interviews is that the reader learns so much about the people of Belfast that a news-media blitz can never be watched the same way again.
From an American's point of view there are many acronyms, phrases, and words that are quite unfamiliar. When this book was released for publication in the United States it would have been more than helpful to have had a glossary that defined the acronyms and explained who the groups were.
Before reading this book I would suggest that the reader have at least some knowledge of the large incidents that have occurred in Northern Ireland's history with regards to England. I stopped midway through chapter five and read a brief history of Northern Ireland so that I could better understand what the interviewees were referring to.
Parker organized his book superbly. I never expected a book of interviews to flow so well. Each interview was as exciting as the last and always for a different reason. I found myself grabbing the book every spare moment I got.
This book is a wonderful contribution to historical studies. It presents a view not often seen in history books-that of the people living through the making of history. If not for a book of this nature the history of the Troubles would be told probably only by party and government leaders. Now for decades and centuries to come the world will know how the people of Belfast were affected, how they felt, and how they as individuals affected the history of Northern Ireland.
I wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone who has any interest in Northern Ireland, England, or in the human condition.
Understanding the Troubles

Path of hope
Armchair pilgrims, read on!
A great story on a the camino de Santiago

Essays on animals and hunting trips by the future PresidentHunting Trips of a Ranchman in effect provides essays on the description, behavior, habitat, and survival of several species known to the prairies and the distant forests and mountain ranges. He talks of wildfowl (grouse, etc), elk, buffalo, pronghorn antelope, bighorn sheep, white-tailed deer, black-tailed or mule deer, and finishes with Old Ephraim, the grizzly bear. All of these books are good for armchair readers who have never been to the western wildernesses or prairies, where these animals can be viewed with perseverance and patience.
Roosevelt speaks of elk as the most noble of the deer family and perhaps the most majestic of all animals (which I tend to agree). He speaks of the incredible speed but also remarkable (and sometimes fatal) curiosity of the pronghorn, who are able to outrun any foes and keep in the open to see them at long distance with their excellent vision. However, they run in a straight line to provide a fairly consistent target for a good marksmen. He speaks of the enjoyable hunting of both kinds of deer, the difficulty of approaching the haunts of the bighorn, and his big finale, one of the best accounts of hunting grizzlies that I have ever read. Roosevelt's respect for the bear's ferocity is manifest, almost amounting to an admitted dread, which shows his good sense.
If you are interested in the American wild, are curious about the habits and habitats of these large species, and are drawn to the hunting and outdoor mentality of the President who helped strengthen the national park system, this will be an entertaining read for you.
Interesting look at key point & place in US history
Wonderful Collection of Short Stories

A fair followup to "Lincoln's Cavalrymen'He falls into the trap of the early CSA were just better and ignores the problems the Union had with building a Cavalry. He did an excellent job of covering this in his last book. Then, he falls into the better equipment trap w/o looking at how the war shifted tatics and the why ANoV failed to adapt.
This is not a bad book but a disapointment after his excellent "Lincoln's Cavalrymen".
Letters, diaries, memoirs of cavalrymen, and more
Lee's CavalrymenLongacre gives a balanced picture of Stuart; it's hard to see how a historian of ANV cavalry could avoid writing about their commander for most of their existence, and Longacre offers both praise and criticism, as well as a couple of insightful points. He's not at all a Stuart partisan; in fact, one gets the feeling he would probably rank Hampton first in tactics.
This book offers a sensible account of the Confederate cavalry at (and not at) Gettysburg, and represents a modification of Longacre's view in his earlier book on the subject. In the earlier book Longacre seemed to accept the viewpoint that Stuart "should have" been present, whereas now, perhaps influenced by *Saber and Scapegoat* (which appears in his bibliography), he takes a more positive view.
Longacre is more original, and perhaps more questionable, when he analyzes the tactics of mounted charges. He claims that ANV troopers wanted to fight mounted, but with revolvers and other firearms rather than sabers, and I wish he had provided more supporting quotes, because I've read plenty of primary sources (Gilmor) where sabers are used with glee. His assertion that sabers were really more effective than firearms at close quarters is interesting, and he goes on to state that mounted charges really were of little use, being more or less outdated and causing high casualties. But did mounted fighting, which took place until the end of the war, actually result in more casualties than attrition, disease among horses and men, or the kind of dismounted fighting cavalrymen sometimes did in the West, where they were ordered to charge breastworks? (history of the 7th TN Cav). I wanted to see more analysis, more numbers and more quotes.
Certainly a complete and interesting account, as far as I know the only such work, and required reading for anyone interested in the topic.


Wonderful exotic recipes - with all that implies
Wonderful but exotic recipes
Truly, the Best Places CookbookI am eagerly awaiting the follow up to this book.


Horrible layout
This book has it all
Super book!